Anticipate deterioration
Use marking age, material, initial measurements, traffic and relevant weather conditions to forecast where performance may be declining.
A nationwide pavement-marking intelligence concept. Designed to help transportation agencies turn a vast road network into a focused inspection plan.
Explore the approach ↗Broad screening. Targeted evidence. Field confirmation.
Pavement markings lose performance as materials age and roads carry traffic through changing weather. Across the country, transportation agencies must decide where to send inspection crews across extensive networks.
Specialized equipment can measure the light a marking returns toward a driver. The challenge is making the most of the time, travel and resources required to collect those measurements.
What if the next inspection route started with a clearer picture of where problems are most likely?
Stripe Signal would bring complementary evidence together, helping agencies focus existing resources on road segments most likely to need attention.
Use marking age, material, initial measurements, traffic and relevant weather conditions to forecast where performance may be declining.
Examine targeted satellite observations and available connected-vehicle evidence for changes associated with marking condition.
Deliver ranked, geolocated inspection candidates so DOT crews can confirm conditions with the equipment they already use.
Explore the proposed workflow. Each stage adds evidence where it can improve the next decision.
A deterioration model screens the road inventory using available installation records and local conditions. Its output is a ranked set of candidates for further assessment.
The aim is to complement transportation teams: use intelligence to improve where they look, then use their measurements to confirm what needs action.
Screen broadly, then obtain additional evidence for selected locations as budgets, coverage and decision value allow.
Group high-priority candidates into practical routes, with the goal of reducing unnecessary mileage and crew time.
Feed field measurements back into evaluation of the forecasts and observations, improving the basis for future priorities.
The proposed deliverable is a clear inspection work package: where to go, which marking to check, why it was prioritized and how recent the supporting observations are.
Agency staff retain the final measurement and maintenance decision. Uncertain or missing observations remain visible.
A pilot would compare prioritized inspection routes with existing selection practices, using reference measurements and a sample of lower-priority roads to check for missed problems.
Deficient segments found per inspection.
Miles driven and crew hours required.
Data, analysis and field costs per confirmed finding.
Deficiencies found among lower-priority segments.
LSU research supports deterioration forecasting from initial retroreflectivity and project conditions. Published connected-vehicle systems demonstrate large-scale road observation. Their combination with satellite features for this specific task requires validation; no measured savings or satellite-based compliance accuracy is claimed here.
Sensor resolution, viewing geometry, observation age and vendor coverage affect usefulness. The design would use only signals shown to improve decisions. A satellite image alone would not establish nighttime retroreflectivity. Named research and providers are references, not announced partners.
A national challenge. A practical opportunity for partnership.